Legal. Strategic. Financial.
MJM Law & PartnersLaw Firm in Malaybalay City, Bukidnon
A law firm combining legal practice with accounting, tax, and finance experience, led by Atty. Mark Joseph Morales, CPA, MBA, JD.
About MJM Law & Partners
Legal Practice With Accounting and Finance Experience
MJM Law & Partners is a law firm in Malaybalay City, Bukidnon that combines legal practice with accounting, tax, and finance experience. We serve individuals who need legal representation, and businesses that need legal, advisory, or financial guidance.
Learn more about our firm
Founder and Managing Partner
Atty. Mark Joseph Morales, CPA, MBA, JD
A lawyer and certified public accountant, Atty. Morales founded MJM Law & Partners to bring legal practice and financial expertise together. His practice covers corporate and tax advisory, banking and financial regulation, and civil and criminal litigation.
Our Services
Legal services, business advisory, and fractional CFO services for individuals and businesses.
Legal Services
Legal counsel in criminal defense, corporate, civil, tax, and banking and financial law.
Fractional CFO
Full finance leadership at a fraction of the cost — planning, analysis, and reporting.
At a glance
- Who we help
- Individuals who need legal representation, and businesses and founders who need legal, advisory, or financial guidance.
- What we handle
- Legal services (see the practice areas), business advisory, and fractional CFO services.
- Where we serve
- Our office is in Malaybalay City, Bukidnon. We work mainly in Bukidnon and Misamis Oriental, and we accept clients anywhere in the Philippines.
- How to start
- For a legal matter, book a 30-minute online consultation. For business advisory or fractional CFO, send an inquiry and we will reply by email or phone.
Practice Area Highlights
Under Legal Services
Corporate Law
Guiding your business through legal complexities with clear, actionable advice.
Civil Litigation
Resolving disputes with strategic insight and robust representation.
Criminal Defense
Defending your rights with precision and empathy.
Tax Advisory
Delivering smart, compliance-focused solutions tailored to your financial goals.
Legal Consultation
Personalized legal consultations to address your specific concerns.
Stay Informed: The Latest in Legal, Business & Financial Insights
Articles on legal, business, and financial management topics.
“No Return, No Exchange”: When Can a Buyer Demand a Refund or Replacement?
A store policy cannot automatically defeat a consumer’s remedies for defective goods. This guide explains the distinction between a genuine defect and a change of mind, the repair and replacement framework under the Consumer Act, and the records and steps that help buyers pursue an appropriate remedy.
DEMYSTIFYING THE NEW 2026 RULES ON MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION
The 2026 Rules on Mandatory Continuing Legal Education introduce a more flexible and practice oriented framework for Philippine lawyers. While the core requirement remains 36 MCLE units every three years, including at least 6 units in Legal Ethics, lawyers may now choose between a General Program and a Focused Program. The Rules also recognize broader educational activities, provide for possible MCLE credit from ULAS, postgraduate studies, legal publications and other qualifying activities, and establish a framework for legal specialization. More importantly, compliance is directly tied to the authority to practice law, making proper completion, documentation, reporting, and maintenance of a valid MCLE compliance certificate essential for every practicing lawyer.
When Inaction Becomes Grave Abuse of Discretion: Can Mandamus Compel Congress to Pass the Anti-Political Dynasty Law?
The article examines whether the Supreme Court may compel Congress through mandamus to fulfill Article II, Section 26 of the 1987 Constitution, which directs the State to prohibit political dynasties “as may be defined by law.” Its central argument is that the Constitution imposes a mandatory duty on Congress to enact the necessary anti-political dynasty law, while Congress retains discretion over the law’s specific content, scope, and enforcement mechanisms. The article weighs this position against the separation of powers concern that legislation is inherently deliberative and discretionary, and therefore may not be a proper subject of mandamus. It ultimately frames the 2026 ruling as part of a broader constitutional question: whether prolonged governmental inaction can itself constitute grave abuse of discretion, while still preserving the Judiciary’s duty to enforce the Constitution without assuming Congress’ legislative function.
Let's talk about what you need
Legal matters can be booked as a 30-minute online consultation. For business advisory or CFO services, or if you are not sure where to start, send us an inquiry.